When determining what your organization will pay early childhood educators for wages and salaries, it is important to understand the economic conditions of your region, whether there is a labour shortage or surplus, and the legislative requirements in place. When determining what to pay, the first is to consider where the new employee falls within the organization, and the second consideration is the skill and experience of the new employee.
Note: If you are in a unionized environment, the collective bargaining process will determine wages or salaries.
It is important to ensure that the approach taken is guided by the compensation philosophy and is applied consistently. Ensuring that established guidelines are followed will prevent offering a compensation package so tailored to a person that the organization is jeopardized by having too heavy a financial burden or that flexible arrangements actually hinder the critical work from being completed. It takes a carefully crafted balance between the organizational needs and individual considerations to arrive at the correct compensation structure.
Answering the questions below will help to formulate the appropriate balance.
Determining base pay is directly linked to your compensation philosophy. Having a clear understanding of what role the position plays in the organization, including the complexity of the required responsibilities and tasks, is factored into the equation along with data on market and sector comparatives. Organizations that take the time to ensure they have factored in all of the following components will be more effective in managing their competitiveness externally as well as their consistency and credibility internally.
Job descriptions define the requirements and responsibilities of the job. Job descriptions are an important element of your organization’s overall compensation philosophy when they are used to develop a consistent salary structure based on the relative level of duties, responsibility and qualifications of each position in the organization.
Conducting an analysis of each job by group/department to determine which tasks are being done and by who will help both to determine if you have the most effective alignment of tasks to jobs, and develop your job descriptions. This is important since compensation structures are built based on the level of skill and experience required for a certain role to perform core functions.
Should you find inconsistencies or inefficiencies, you should conduct a review to evaluate the appropriateness of the tasks assigned to that role. From there you determine if the job description and associated compensation warrants changing or not.
Job evaluation is a process by which you rank individual jobs within and between groups/departments of your organization. The process usually consists of describing the skill level, competencies, tasks and responsibility/authority of a role. Roles that are of a similar discipline or field are often grouped together and referred to as a “job family”. From there, levels are usually used to delineate the skills and competencies required, progressing from a junior to more senior level. For some professions, academic credentials can delineate between levels as can registration in a technical field.
Example:
- Your organization requires employees with a diploma in early childhood education.
- You group the roles together into an “early childhood educator” job-family
- You then create an evaluation scale that starts with:
- Entry level, then progresses to
- Intermediate, then
- Senior, then
- Supervisory
- Once the levels are established, a written description is developed outlining the tasks, responsibilities, competencies, and authority for each level of Early Childhood Educator.
- When evaluating a specific role, you need to determine which level the skills and competencies are best aligned with. If the tasks align with a specific level, then the compensation for that role is applied. Compensation is based on the appropriate level of skill and responsibility versus being based on the potential or qualifications of the individuals alone.
Organizational Awareness |
Level 1- EntryLearns working knowledge of organizational structure. Level 2- IntermediateQuickly develops working knowledge of organization and relationships for problem-solving. Level 3- SeniorPossess strong knowledge of organization and relationships (formal and informal). Level 4- SupervisoryPossess in-depth knowledge of organization and relationships (internal and external) affecting team and organizational success. |
Communication skills |
Level 1- EntryDemon-strates an understand-ing of basic communica-tion skills. Able to present ideas in a clear structure both verbally and written. Level 2- IntermediateDemonstrates ability to acquire, interpret and communicate information. Able to clearly define task/job requirements. Demonstrates ability to present ideas clearly in written and verbal forms. Level 3- SeniorAble to select appropriate information and best method or format for presentation in written and verbal forms. Able to clearly convey ideas on non-routine subjects. Level 4- SupervisoryCapable of using persuasion and negotiation to build cooperation and consensus towards decisions. Able to translate advanced technical issues into understandable terms for non-technical users. |
Team Work |
Level 1- EntryWorks collaboratively with people both inside and outside of the agency recognizing her/his role in relation to the team to accomplish given tasks. Level 2- IntermediateDemonstrates competence to work with and share responsibilities while modeling positive interactions within the team. Level 3- SeniorCapable of planning, managing and working on shared or joint projects as applicable. Coordinates with others to achieve agreed upon outcomes. Level 4- SupervisoryLeads team efforts, and assessing and integrating the skills and strengths of individuals and teams for project and organizational success. |
For some organizations, the ranking is based on hierarchical responsibilities and for others the ranking is directly linked to market-based pay. Based on this analysis, a compensation matrix or comparative chart can be developed to track comparatives. With either approach, the goal is to identify what is required to ensure satisfactory performance and/or progression. Therefore, the same criteria should be used when hiring a new employee, during the establishment of goals and expectations, in recognizing achievement, or in promotion of an employee. Even if the factors used to differentiate between levels are based on academic or technical requirements, the importance is on actually achieving the target or receiving the credentials.
Pay structures are helpful when standardizing your organization’s compensation practices. Typical pay structures can have several grades or levels, career bands, or job families with each having a minimum or maximum salary associated. These could be identified by hourly wages or annual salaries.
As in the previous example, a number of levels may exist for a role or types of roles linked together. A dollar value would be associated for each one. Creation of pay structures are based on internal and/or external data.
Building a matrix that identifies the hierarchy of the job family through levels as well as skills and competencies can assist in determining the appropriate placement of a position.
Example: Job X against market data (numbers have been made up for purposes of this example)
|
Salary Scale
|
Salary Scale
|
External Survey Midpoint |
Intermediate |
35,550 – 43,450 |
39,500 |
40,000 |
Senior |
39,690 – 48,510 |
44,100 |
45,000 |
Supervisory |
47,880 – 58,520 |
53,200 |
58,500 |
In this example, the intermediate and senior salary midpoints are consistent with the external market data. However, the supervisory midpoint is significantly below market averages. A supervisor in this organization would have to be receiving 110% of the salary scale to be consistent with the market’s average salary. In this case, the first salary the organization would want to address would be that of the supervisory staff.
|
Salary Scale
|
Salary Scale
|
Average Salary of Current Incumbents |
Percentage of Midpoint |
Intermediate |
35,550 – 43,450 |
39,500 |
39,000 |
99% |
Senior |
39,690 – 48,510 |
44,100 |
43,200 |
98% |
Supervisory |
48,780 – 59,620 |
54,200 |
51,500 |
95% |
Similarly in this example, the average salaries for the both the intermediate and senior staff are close to the organization’s salary midpoint, whereas the supervisory salaries are only 95% of the organization’s midpoint (which is $5,000 less than the midpoint of all the organizations who participated in the salary survey). This type of inequity, both internally and against the market, could result in increased difficultly keeping or finding the right people.
Tools and Resources
Be very careful referencing salary grids or wage scales. Salaries are affected by factors such as province, city, size of centre, resources, auspice (non-profit, public, for-profit), union or non-union, cost of living, and government subsidies or grants. The following example demonstrates what a salary grid could look like. It demonstrates the relativity of salaries – you should not focus on the absolute numbers.
This grid provided by a child care centre recognizes years of service as well as academic qualifications.
Year |
No Formal Training |
Diploma |
Certificate |
Start |
12.95 |
16.92 |
18.30 |
1 Year Exp. |
14.14 |
18.12 |
19.50 |
2 Years |
14.74 |
18.72 |
20.09 |
3 Years |
15.34 |
19.32 |
20.68 |
4 Years |
15.93 |
19.90 |
21.28 |
5 Years |
16.54 |
20.50 |
21.89 |
Salary surveys are conducted with numerous employers in the same labour market to determine pay levels for specific job categories. Generally, wage and salary surveys are conducted either by region, sector or job classification for the purposes of comparability. By participating in salary surveys, you’ll be have access to information that will allow you to benchmark your organization’s compensation practices – including wages, salaries, bonuses and benefit provisions – against other organizations in your region or sector.
Once the previous steps have been completed, it is important to document your organization’s compensation philosophy and policy.
You should also develop and document strategies for all compensation practices including merit raises, cost-of-living increases, performance reviews, bonuses and promotions.
Compensation for part-time employees should be consistent with your overall compensation philosophy. In many cases, a regular part-time employee will participate in both salary and benefit programs on a pro-rated basis to that of a full-time employee. The most important consideration is that you provide the kind of fair and equitable compensation to a part-time person as you do to one working full-time.
Example: If you have an employee who works .6 of a full-time position or three days a week (22.5 hours) that employee would usually be eligible for the same benefits as a full-time employee. However, the benefits may look different and there are a few exceptions.
Vacation
If a full-time person earns 15 vacation days a year; then the part-time person should earn 15 days X .6 (the percentage of time they work part-time) or nine full-time vacation days per year. Therefore, a full-time person who takes a “week” of holidays must take five days away as per their normally scheduled days. When a part-time person takes a “week” of holiday, they are in fact only taking three days, or their normally scheduled days per week.Statutory Holidays
A full-time person is entitled to a set number of statutory holidays a year (depending on the jurisdiction) whereas a part-time person, according to employment standards, only receives statutory holiday pay for those days that they are regularly scheduled to work. As the rules for each province differ, please consult the employment standards for your jurisdiction for further clarification on the treatment of statutory holidays for part-time employees.
The minimum wage is designed to impose a broad and enforceable standard on employers that would guarantee a minimum level of income for unskilled, non-unionized workers. Minimum wage standards are also designed to stop these workers from trying to undercut each other by agreeing to work for less than someone else. Some exceptions exist for those who are student employees, self-employed, independent contracts and commissioned sales people. Each province or territory has its own minimum wage guidelines and exceptions.
Base pay is a fixed regular payment made to an employee in exchange for performance of the duties and responsibilities of their job. When an employee receives an increase to their base pay, it is considered a pay increase. There are various reasons and methods for determining an increase, but the common factor is that the increase changes the level of ongoing base pay.
Bonus pay is compensation over and above the amount of pay specified as wages or salary and it is only distributed as the organization is able to pay or as outlined in an employment contract.
Bonus pay is used by many organizations to improve employee morale, motivation and productivity or as a thank you to employees who achieve a significant goal.
As long as bonus pay is discretionary by the employer, it is not considered to be a contract. If the employer promises a bonus, they may be legally liable to pay it out.
Incentive plans have not typically been popular in the ECEC sector. However, leaders are starting to see a change in perspective regarding the use of incentive plans. Providing incentive plans, especially to senior level staff, can enable organizations to compete for talent they would otherwise not have been able to pursue.
Newsletter Signup
Follow Us